Parenting in wartime

When the basement becomes the place the family sleeps three nights a week, it becomes furniture. Parents arrange mattresses, hang a sheet for privacy, find a corner for the children's school books, mark a place for the dog. The shelter is not a space the family passes through; it is a space the family inhabits part-time. Children form friendships with the children of other families who shelter there. The parent's task is to allow the shelter to feel sufficiently like a place that the child can be a person inside it, while not allowing the shelter to feel so normal that the child loses the impulse to want a different kind of normal. The balance is difficult and the parent rarely gets it exactly right, but the attempt is the work.

Children who grow up with air-raid sirens develop a startle response that takes years to unwind. The parent watches the child flinch and tries to provide a stable presence that says the body's reaction is correct and the parent is also here. Some parents make a game of it, counting the seconds, naming each siren, to give the child a small sense of agency over a sound that is otherwise entirely outside their control. The games are partial defenses; they help on most days. On the days a siren is followed by an actual impact nearby, the games stop working and the parent has to find a different mode, usually involving sitting with the child in silence afterward and not pretending the silence is comfortable.

Teachers continue to teach. Parents continue to insist on homework. Schoolwork in wartime is partly preparation for the eventual peace and partly a structural device to keep the child's mind organized around something other than the war. Mathematics, in particular, does this work well; it is impersonal and demanding and reliably distracting. Parents who lean on the schoolwork are not avoiding the war. They are using one of the few stable scaffolds available for the child's day. When the school resumes physically, the teachers note which children kept up and which did not, and the variation often correlates with which parents had the energy to insist on the homework. Energy, in wartime parenting, is the scarce resource the literature underestimates.

The father has gone to the front, or the mother has been called up if the conflict reaches her cohort. The remaining partner runs the household and the absent partner becomes a phone voice, when the phones work, and a photograph on the wall. Children negotiate this with a mixture of pride, anger, and quiet fear. The remaining parent has to model how to hold the absence: not minimize it, not catastrophize it, just include it in the daily texture. Conversations happen in the past tense and the conditional tense and rarely in the simple present, because the simple present is too dangerous to share with the child until the partner is home. The grammar of wartime parenthood is a thing linguists have not adequately described.

The decision to leave is rarely clean. The parents argue, the grandparents refuse to go, the cat cannot come, the borders close in a sequence that was not announced in advance. Most evacuations are not the dramatic moments in the films; they are slow, contested, partial. The family that leaves does not leave together; the family that stays does not stay together. Parents make the call with incomplete information and live with it. The children, asked later, often have a stronger opinion than the parents expected, and the opinion is not always grateful. Whether to leave is one of the central decisions of wartime parenthood and there is no playbook that gets it right consistently. The parent learns to make peace with having decided, whichever way, because second-guessing in wartime is a sink that takes energy the family needs.

Bodies appear. On the street, in the news, in the description offered by a neighbor who came back from the front. Parents shield, partially, and fail to shield, partially. The child sees more than the parent wishes and less than the streets contain. The parent's task is not to seal the child's eyes but to give the child a way to process what the eyes have seen. Naming helps. Naming the dead, naming the cause of death, naming the family that lost them. The unnamed dead are harder for children than the named dead. The parent who can find names is doing protective work even when the protection looks like the opposite.

In wartime, the information environment is thick with rumor. The bridge is destroyed; no it is open; no it has been mined. Parents have to make decisions based on signals they cannot verify, and they have to model for the child how to weigh signals without becoming either paranoid or naive. This is a quiet pedagogy of epistemology under stress. Children learn from parents how to discount, how to triangulate, how to wait an hour before acting on a panic-inducing report. These are habits that will serve them in many later contexts, including some that have nothing to do with war.

Both are abundant. Parents in flight encounter the bus driver who waives the fare, the cafe owner who gives the children pastries, the family who hosts you for a night in a country you do not share a language with. They also encounter the official who turns you back, the customs agent who steals from your bag, the landlord who triples the rent. Parents have to teach the child to see both without collapsing into either narrative. Humans are like this, the parent says, or implies, by the way they thank the kind stranger and refuse to be broken by the cruel one. This is a moral education the parent did not plan to give yet, and it lands earlier than expected.

Grandparents in many wartime evacuations refuse to leave their homes. They are too old, they say, they have lived through worse, they would rather die where they were born. The parent and the children leave, sometimes, and the grandparent stays. The phone calls back are infrequent and short. The grandparent dies, sometimes, before the war ends, and the funeral cannot be attended. The grief that follows the war includes this grief, and it is sometimes the heaviest piece, because it was a choice that was made and cannot be unmade. Parents carry it and try not to put it on the children, with partial success.

Children in wartime draw what they see. The tanks, the planes, the burning building, the soldier, the mother crying. The drawings are sometimes alarming to parents and to the international NGOs who collect them. They are also a healthy externalization of what the child is processing, and parents who recognize this respond well: they ask about the drawing, they let the child explain, they keep the drawing rather than throw it away. The drawing is the child's contribution to the family's record of the war. Years later, when the child is an adult, the drawings will be one of the artifacts they want to see again. The parent who saved them did the child a service the parent could not have articulated at the time.

The war ends, or pauses, and the family returns. The apartment is intact, or partially intact, or gone. The neighborhood has changed. The neighbors are dispersed. The school has a new principal. The parent has to reconstruct a daily life inside the same walls that now mean something different. Children adjust faster than adults, partly because they have less to compare against, partly because their friendships re-knit quickly when they are allowed to. Parents sometimes find the return harder than the displacement, because the absence of war should feel like relief and instead feels like a different kind of disorientation. This is the part of wartime parenthood the literature most undertreats: the after, which is not over.

The mobilized parent returns. The reintegration takes years. The children, who imagined the parent during the absence, meet a person who does not quite match the image. The parent who stayed is exhausted from having held the household alone and is not always ready to share the holding. The veteran is sometimes silent, sometimes too loud, sometimes hurt in ways no one can see. The family rebuilds, and the rebuilding is part of parenting in wartime even though the war is technically over. Children who grew up in this rebuild often describe their own parenting later as shaped by what they learned watching two adults figure out how to be a family again after a separation neither chose.

There are things parents in wartime do not tell their children, sometimes for years, sometimes ever. The cousin who collaborated. The neighbor who took the apartment of the family that fled. The compromise the mother made to get the family across the border. These omissions are part of the inheritance too. The child, becoming an adult, eventually senses the gaps and either asks or does not ask. The parent decides, in old age, whether to fill in. Many do not. The history of parenting in wartime is therefore partly a history of silences, and the silences are not failures so much as the cost of having gotten everyone through. Wise children, when they understand this, do not insist. They thank the parent for the silences along with the words.

1. Enloe, Cynthia. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. 2. Mayer, Tamar, ed. Gender Ironies of Nationalism: Sexing the Nation. London: Routledge, 2000. 3. Press, Eyal. Beautiful Souls: Saying No, Breaking Ranks, and Heeding the Voice of Conscience in Dark Times. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012. 4. Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. 5. Roy, Sara. The Gaza Strip: The Political Economy of De-development. 3rd ed. Washington: Institute for Palestine Studies, 2016. 6. Abu-Lughod, Lila. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013. 7. de Waal, Alex. Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018. 8. Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf, 1999. 9. Menjívar, Cecilia. Enduring Violence: Ladina Women's Lives in Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. 10. Shah, Sonia. The Next Great Migration: The Beauty and Terror of Life on the Move. New York: Bloomsbury, 2020. 11. Vince, Gaia. Nomad Century: How Climate Migration Will Reshape Our World. New York: Flatiron Books, 2022. 12. Dreby, Joanna. Divided by Borders: Mexican Migrants and Their Children. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.