The hopeful teenager — what they need from adults

Hopeful teenagers are not a monolith. Some come to hope through religious or spiritual frameworks that locate human action within larger meanings. Some come through political analysis that locates them in lineages of social movements. Some come through scientific engagement that reveals both the scale of problems and the genuine pathways out. Some come through embodied practice in nature, food production, or craft. Some come through family — a parent, grandparent, or sibling who modelled engaged hope across years. Some come through art, where they have found ways to make meaning that does not require collapse. Recognizing this diversity matters because adult institutions tend to recognize only one or two pathways to hope, missing the others. A school program designed only for activist-oriented teenagers will miss the hopeful artist, the hopeful farmer, the hopeful engineer. The collective response is plural.

Across youth testimony, one request recurs: take the crisis as seriously as we do. Hopeful teenagers report being most demoralized not by news of disasters but by encountering adult institutions whose response does not match the stakes. A school that runs sustainability club meetings while operating diesel buses, a government that signs climate accords while subsidizing fossil fuels, a parent who agrees that climate is serious but takes no action — all communicate a misalignment that hopeful teenagers read accurately. The match-our-seriousness ask is not for adults to perform alarm; it is for adults to act commensurately. This is a structural demand on institutions, not a tone demand on individuals. Meeting it requires institutional change. Failing to meet it produces a generation that learns to discount adult words because adult actions do not back them up.

A hopeful teenager who wants to act needs accessible pathways. Most communities offer either nothing or only highly symbolic options. Real on-ramps include youth participation in actual policy processes with actual influence, paid internships with climate-relevant organizations, school-supported gap year programs in restoration or community work, accessible technical training in skilled trades relevant to transition, and seed funding for youth-led projects with real budgets and real accountability. The infrastructure for this is patchy. Some cities and regions have built it; most have not. Building it is concrete adult work. Without real on-ramps, hopeful teenagers either burn out trying to create their own infrastructure or redirect their energy into other domains, often losing the climate commitment along the way.

Hopeful teenagers consistently report wanting mentors who treat them as capable agents rather than as either fragile children or fully formed activists. The middle posture is rarer than either extreme. A good mentor for a hopeful teenager listens more than they advise, opens doors without requiring gratitude, models honest struggle without dumping adult anxieties, and stays in relationship across years rather than only during peak interest. Mentorship infrastructure — formal programs, informal community structures, intergenerational cohorts — varies enormously by community. Investing in this infrastructure is high-leverage. A teenager with one stable adult ally who matches their seriousness can sustain engagement through obstacles that would defeat a teenager working alone. The collective task includes recruiting, training, and supporting such mentors at scale.

Hope is expressed in action. Action requires resources. A hopeful teenager whose project requires transportation, equipment, communication tools, or time cannot sustain the project on personal resources alone. The contrast with adult institutions is stark: corporations and governments routinely allocate millions to projects of less significance than youth-led climate work. The collective task is to direct meaningful resources toward youth-led work. This includes municipal youth budgets with real authority, philanthropic funding pipelines accessible to teenage applicants, school-based funding for student projects beyond token amounts, and family-level support that does not require the teenager to fund their own activism. Money is a form of taking work seriously. Withholding it while praising the work communicates the actual hierarchy.

Hopeful teenagers burn out at predictable rates. The drivers include schedule overload, emotional intensity, lack of adult support, conflict with school and family expectations, and the pace of crisis itself. The burnout pattern often produces bitter young adults who exit the work entirely. Protecting against this requires deliberate effort. Practices include scheduled rest, supervised emotional processing, clear limits on responsibility, adult buffers for high-conflict situations, and explicit permission to step back without guilt. Movement organizations are increasingly building these practices, though uneven. Schools and families often replicate burnout culture by treating high-engagement teenagers as models without protecting them from overextension. The collective task is to normalize sustainability practices for young people, modeled by adults who have learned them the hard way.

Media and movements extract from hopeful teenagers in predictable ways. A young person becomes visible, is platformed extensively, becomes a symbol, attracts both adulation and attack, and is then dropped when newer stories emerge or their politics evolve in inconvenient directions. The pattern has been documented across multiple movements. Preventing extraction requires structural changes: media practices that protect minor sources, movement structures that distribute spokesperson roles across groups rather than concentrating them in individuals, family and legal supports for young people in public roles, and long-term commitment from adult institutions to the young people they elevate. Without these, the extraction continues, producing a steady supply of disillusioned former-hopeful-teenagers. The collective failure here is significant and well-documented. Fixing it is overdue.

Hopeful teenagers are sustained by community. Isolated hope dies. Community in this sense includes peer groups engaged in similar work, intergenerational networks of adults committed across years, place-based communities with shared stakes, and translocal communities connected through shared frameworks. Building such communities is concrete work. It requires physical spaces where young people can gather without commercial pressure, regular structures for relationship development, intentional bridge-building across difference, and protection of the relational time that algorithmic environments tend to colonize. The infrastructure of community is being eroded by economic pressures, screen time, and atomization. Defending and rebuilding it is climate-era work, even when the explicit focus is not climate. Hopeful teenagers raised in thick community become durable adults; those raised in thin community do not.

Hopeful teenagers who absorb a thin version of hope — that everything will work out, that their efforts will produce victory, that the future is secure — become brittle. When evidence disappoints them, they collapse into the despair their peers had been in all along, often with added bitterness from having been misled. Adults who give them durable hope give them Solnit's version: hope as the conviction that something is worth doing regardless of outcome, that the work itself has meaning, that the long arc is bent only by sustained pressure across generations. This is harder to communicate than thin hope but produces more durable young people. The collective task is to train adults — teachers, parents, mentors, organizers — in conveying this thicker version. The training is not difficult; it requires that the adults themselves have done the work.

Hopeful teenagers often carry an implicit demand for intergenerational accountability. They want to know that adults are doing their share. They want elders engaged, parents committed, professionals using their positions, voters voting, citizens organizing. Meeting this demand requires that adults examine their own engagement honestly. A parent who tells their teenager to be hopeful while themselves doing nothing communicates that hope is a youth performance, not a shared commitment. A teacher who tells students climate matters while ignoring climate in their own life teaches that climate is rhetorical. The collective task is to build adult cultures of engagement that match what we ask of young people. This is the part of the work that adults often want to skip. Skipping it produces hopeful teenagers who eventually conclude that hope is a thing adults extracted from them while declining to participate themselves.

Many hopeful teenagers become hopeful young adults who want to direct their working lives toward climate and ecological work. The career infrastructure for this is patchy. Climate-relevant jobs exist across virtually every sector, but the pathways into them are unclear, the credentialing is fragmented, and the financial support during training is often inadequate. Building career pathways — clear, supported, financially viable routes from school into climate work across many fields — is essential infrastructure. This includes apprenticeships in skilled trades for the energy transition, fellowships in policy and advocacy, supported entrepreneurship in regenerative business, research pathways for scientists, and creative pathways for artists. Without these pathways, hopeful teenagers face an unnecessary cliff between adolescent engagement and adult work. Many fall off it.

Hopeful teenagers who become engaged adults who become committed elders who mentor the next generation of hopeful teenagers represent the cycle the collective work requires. This cycle is not automatic. It is sustained by infrastructure, by culture, by practice, and by deliberate attention to the transitions between life stages. The collective task is to think across this entire arc, not just the youth-engagement segment. A movement that recruits teenagers but loses them at thirty, a society that celebrates youth activism but offers no path for sustained adult work, a culture that valorizes elder wisdom but does not support actual elders in remaining engaged — all fail to close the cycle. Closing it requires intentional design across decades. The hopeful teenagers in front of us are the early indicator of whether the design is working.

Years later, hopeful teenagers who became engaged adults remember specific things from the adults who supported them. They remember adults who showed up consistently. They remember adults who took their ideas seriously when others did not. They remember adults who introduced them to other adults doing the work. They remember adults who told them the truth, including hard truths, with care. They remember adults who funded a small project, wrote a recommendation, made a connection, defended them from criticism, and stayed in relationship through hard periods. None of this is dramatic. All of it is ordinary. The collective task is to make this ordinary care widely available, so that every hopeful teenager has access to at least a few such adults, regardless of family background or community resources. This is the infrastructure that revises the future across generations. It is built one relationship at a time, and it is the most important thing adult institutions can do.

Solnit, Rebecca. Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. 3rd ed. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2016.

Figueres, Christiana, and Tom Rivett-Carnac. The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis. New York: Knopf, 2020.

Johnson, Ayana Elizabeth, and Katharine K. Wilkinson, eds. All We Can Save: Truth, Courage, and Solutions for the Climate Crisis. New York: One World, 2020.

Heglar, Mary Annaïse. "But the Greatest of These Is Love." Medium, October 9, 2019.

Sherrell, Daniel. Warmth: Coming of Age at the End of Our World. New York: Penguin Books, 2021.

Wray, Britt. Generation Dread: Finding Purpose in an Age of Climate Crisis. Toronto: Knopf Canada, 2022.

Ray, Sarah Jaquette. A Field Guide to Climate Anxiety: How to Keep Your Cool on a Warming Planet. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020.

Hickman, Caroline, Elizabeth Marks, Panu Pihkala, Susan Clayton, R. Eric Lewandowski, Elouise E. Mayall, Britt Wray, Catriona Mellor, and Lise van Susteren. "Climate Anxiety in Children and Young People and Their Beliefs about Government Responses to Climate Change: A Global Survey." The Lancet Planetary Health 5, no. 12 (2021): e863–e873.

Clayton, Susan. "Climate Anxiety: Psychological Responses to Climate Change." Journal of Anxiety Disorders 74 (2020): 102263.

Ritchie, Hannah. Not the End of the World: How We Can Be the First Generation to Build a Sustainable Planet. London: Chatto and Windus, 2024.

Wallace-Wells, David. The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming. New York: Tim Duggan Books, 2019.

Rieder, Travis N. Catastrophe Ethics: How to Choose Well in a World of Tough Choices. New York: Dutton, 2024.