Secular alternatives to religious community

Phil Zuckerman's Living the Secular Life documents what secular Americans actually report about their lives: high satisfaction with leaving religion, strong ethical commitments, often elaborate substitute meaning-making practices — and a recurring acknowledgment that the community piece is harder than they expected. Many describe family-of-friends arrangements that work well in their twenties and thirties and thin out as children arrive and friends scatter. The satisfaction with leaving is not contradicted by the difficulty of replacing; both are true, and the difficulty is the part secular movements have under-addressed.

Felix Adler founded the New York Society for Ethical Culture in 1876 explicitly as a Jewish-Christian-agnostic ethical community without theology. Ethical Culture societies grew to about 30 chapters at peak, ran Sunday schools, performed weddings and funerals, founded one of the country's best private schools, and persist today at small scale (perhaps 5,000 members nationally). The track record is instructive: the model works for a specific constituency (educated, urban, ethically serious, theologically uninterested), works durably over generations, and does not scale beyond that constituency without changes that the existing societies have generally not made. It is proof that secular congregation is possible. It is also proof that proof of concept is not the same as scale.

The UUA is the largest organized expression of latitudinal religious community in the U.S., with roughly 1,000 congregations and 200,000-ish members. Many UU congregations function as de facto secular community for families who want congregational structure without theological demands. They run RE (religious education) programs that look very much like Sunday school with the doctrinal content swapped out for ethics, world religions, and identity exploration. The denominational decline mirrors the broader Protestant decline, but UU has held up better than mainline peers, and the congregations that emphasize the architectural features (weekly attendance, multi-generational programming, mutual aid) do measurably better than the ones that emphasize political identity.

Sanderson Jones and Pippa Evans launched Sunday Assembly in London in 2013 with the slogan "live better, help often, wonder more" and explicit reference to copying the church format without the supernatural. The movement spread to dozens of cities, hit roughly 70 chapters at peak, and has since contracted to a smaller, more stable core. The trajectory is informative: the demand for the format is real, but sustaining a chapter requires the same kind of unpaid leadership and unglamorous logistics that sustain a small church, and most chapters could not assemble the leadership long-term. The model works. The labor model is hard.

The Society for Humanistic Judaism, founded by Sherwin Wine in 1963, runs a small network of congregations for Jews who want Jewish community without theistic content. More broadly, secular Jewish identity has supported a wider infrastructure — JCCs, secular day schools, cultural organizations, Israel-trip programs (with all the political complications of the latter) — that has done meaningful childrearing work for Jewish families regardless of belief. The lesson is that ethnic-cultural identity can scaffold community more easily than pure philosophical commitment can; secular communities that piggyback on existing cultural identity (Jewish, Black, Italian, etc.) have an easier time than pure philosophical-affinity groups.

American Buddhist communities, especially in the Insight and Zen traditions, have absorbed many former Christians and Jews and a substantial cohort of "spiritual but not religious" seekers. The sanghas function partially as community, and for child-rearing families specifically, the better ones run family programs that look a great deal like Sunday school. The constraint is that Buddhism in America has been disproportionately a young-adult and middle-age-no-children institution; the family-friendly sangha is a real but minority phenomenon. The infrastructure exists in pockets, mainly on the coasts.

A small but instructive movement: cohousing communities (roughly 200 in the U.S.) deliberately design residential architecture to produce daily contact among unrelated families, with shared meals, shared childcare, and shared maintenance. For the families who live in them, cohousing delivers many of the connective goods of a congregation without the theological apparatus. The constraint is the housing market: building cohousing is expensive, slow, and depends on zoning and finance models that most cities make difficult. The model works; the production rate is not close to demand.

Many secular families default to a small friend network — three to six families who deliberately stay close, vacation together, mind each other's children, and constitute a chosen kinship group. When this works it works beautifully and produces real intergenerational relationships. The failure modes are well-documented: friend groups don't replenish when families move, don't naturally mix ages, depend on personal compatibility that families can outgrow, and have no institutional persistence — when the founding families lose touch, nothing replaces them. The friend-group village is a fragile institution. It is also, currently, the modal secular substitute.

Travel soccer and Little League have, almost despite themselves, become the largest weekly multi-family commitment in many middle-class American childhoods. Parents stand on sidelines for hours every weekend, families travel together, friendships form. The community is real but specifically shaped: it sorts by athletic ability, ages by cohort, and consumes a punishing share of family time. For some families it does meaningful connective work; for others it is the thing that prevents them from doing any other connective thing. The cost-benefit is messy, and the displacement of religious community by youth sports has not been quietly examined.

Almost every secular substitute requires the family to do the founding work — to identify the community, recruit the other families, organize the cadence, host the meals. This labor is enormous and falls disproportionately on women. Religious congregations, whatever else they did, professionalized the labor: a paid clergy and staff ran the logistics, and members could show up. Secular alternatives that depend on member labor have a structural disadvantage that no amount of enthusiasm fully overcomes. The substitutes that have worked have either had paid staff (UU, Ethical Culture) or have been small enough that the labor was distributable.

A practical observation from across the secular community projects: the rituals work without the theology. Lighting candles, singing together, holding a moment of silence, observing the solstice, reading aloud the names of the dead — these produce the same neurological and social effects whether or not anyone in the room believes in a god. Secular families who incorporate ritual repetition (Friday-night dinner, seasonal observances, a regular silence, named annual markers) generally report stronger family cohesion than those who don't. The atheist instinct to strip ritual as superstition has been one of the unforced errors of secular community-building. Rituals are technology.

Even when secular community works for the founding generation of parents, the question of transmission to the next generation is open. Bengtson's data suggests that secular identity transmits at lower rates than religious identity historically did, partly because secular families more often lack the architectural features (weekly attendance, ritual repetition, intergenerational adult-child contact). The implication is that secular families serious about their kids' connective lives will need to be more institutionally deliberate than their religious counterparts were, not less. The freedom of "no required institution" comes with the burden of building one yourself.

If the trajectory of religious affiliation continues, by 2050 a majority of American children will be raised by parents with no congregational affiliation, and most will lack any equivalent. The choice for the secular movement, if it can be said to have one, is whether to keep insisting that personal autonomy is sufficient — the position that has produced the current thinness — or to accept that community is infrastructure and that infrastructure has to be built, funded, staffed, and defended over generations. The honest version of this acceptance is humble (Law 0): we don't yet know how to build it at the scale we need. The honest next step is to start building anyway, learning from the religious traditions we have left without pretending we can have their fruits without doing their work.

1. Zuckerman, Phil. Living the Secular Life: New Answers to Old Questions. New York: Penguin Press, 2014. 2. Zuckerman, Phil. Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment. New York: New York University Press, 2008. 3. Bengtson, Vern L., with Norella M. Putney and Susan Harris. Families and Faith: How Religion Is Passed Down across Generations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 4. Smith, Christian, and Melinda Lundquist Denton. Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. 5. Wuthnow, Robert. Loose Connections: Joining Together in America's Fragmented Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. 6. Wuthnow, Robert. After the Baby Boomers: How Twenty- and Thirty-Somethings Are Shaping the Future of American Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 7. Putnam, Robert D., and David E. Campbell. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010. 8. Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. 9. Oldenburg, Ray. The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe & Company, 1989. 10. Klinenberg, Eric. Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. New York: Crown, 2018. 11. Paris, Leslie. Children's Nature: The Rise of the American Summer Camp. New York: New York University Press, 2008. 12. Mechling, Jay. On My Honor: Boy Scouts and the Making of American Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.