The walk without a destination

Stanford studies by Marily Oppezzo and Daniel Schwartz have documented that walking increases creative output and divergent thinking compared to sitting, even when the walking is on a treadmill facing a blank wall. The effect is not about novelty of scenery; it is about the motion itself. Apply this to two people walking together and the cognitive loosening compounds. The conversation that emerges has access to material that desk-bound conversation cannot reach. This is why couples therapists increasingly recommend walking conversations for stuck dynamics.

Face-to-face conversation is socially intense. The face is the most scrutinized object in human communication, and conversation across a table involves continuous micro-management of facial expression. Side-by-side conversation, by contrast, frees both partners from face-management and allows the contents of the mind to surface with less editing. This is one reason why some of the deepest conversations in a marriage happen in cars, kitchens (while one person cooks), or on walks — all settings where eye contact is intermittent rather than continuous. The walk is the most flexible of these venues because it is portable and free.

Stan Tatkin's work on couple regulation emphasizes that hard conversations go better when both nervous systems are calm. Walking calms nervous systems through rhythm, breath, and the dispersal of energy through the legs. Couples who have a difficult topic to broach often find that broaching it on a walk produces a different conversation than broaching it at home. The same words, in motion, escalate less and resolve more. If there is a hard topic in your marriage right now, consider waiting until tomorrow's walk to raise it.

Hour-long walks produce different conversations than twenty-minute walks. The first twenty minutes is often clearing — logistics, the day, surface complaints. The middle section is where the conversation finds its real subject. The last section is often where the most important things get said, because both partners are warmed up, the walk's end is approaching, and there is a soft pressure to say what needed saying before getting back to the house. Twenty-minute walks rarely access this third phase. The hour matters.

A walk is also an exercise in mutual regulation. You find a pace together. Couples in good shape find it quickly and unconsciously. Couples in trouble walk at mismatched paces and resent the mismatch without naming it. The pace negotiation is a small, daily practice of marital coordination. If you cannot walk at a shared pace, you cannot do much else together either. The good news is that pace matching, like most marital skills, improves with practice.

The best routes are loops, because loops produce no decision pressure about when to turn around. Loops in parks, neighborhoods, or trails all work. Avoid commercial streets if you can; the visual and auditory stimulation of storefronts and traffic competes for attention. Quiet routes are better than scenic routes for conversation, because spectacular scenery pulls attention outward toward seeing rather than inward toward each other.

Some of the best stretches of a couple's walk are silent. Silence on a walk is not awkward the way silence at a table is, because the walking itself is the activity; conversation is optional ornament. Couples who can be silent together while walking are doing something most other couples cannot. Silence is one of the deepest forms of intimacy and one of the hardest to access through any other means. Walking is its natural venue.

Bad weather is not a real obstacle. Walking in rain, snow, cold, and heat all work, with appropriate clothing. The willingness to walk in weather is itself a form of marital investment that pays disproportionately. The romance of walking in rain together is a cliché because it is true. The minor discomfort produces shared narrative — "remember the walk where we got soaked?" — that becomes part of the marriage's stock of memory. Comfortable walks blur into each other. Slightly uncomfortable walks are remembered.

Daily walking, even short, beats weekly walking, even long. The daily rhythm makes the walk part of the marriage's structure rather than a special event. Couples who walk daily before dinner, or after dinner, or first thing in the morning, are running a small marital infrastructure that does an enormous amount of relational work invisibly. The infrastructure is the point. Special events do less than infrastructure does.

Walks with a dog count, walks with children count, but they count differently. The dog and the children are agents in the system; they introduce interruption and external focus. These walks are valuable but they are not substitutes for the walk alone. If your couple's walking is always accompanied by dependents, find a way, even once a week, to walk without them. The conversation that requires solitude as a pair will not emerge in the family configuration.

A marriage of forty years might contain ten thousand walks together. Each one is small. The aggregate is one of the largest accumulations of shared experience in the marriage. Old couples who have walked together for decades tend to describe walking as one of the things they will miss most when one of them is gone. They are not being sentimental. They are being accurate about what made the marriage what it was. The walks were not a side activity. The walks were a substantial fraction of the marriage's actual content.

If you have not been walking together, start tomorrow. Do not announce a program. Just say: "Let's go for a walk." Put the phone in a drawer. Walk slowly. Have nowhere to go. Come back when you come back. Do it again on Wednesday. Within a month, the walk will become a load-bearing structure of your week, and you will wonder how the marriage functioned without it. The likely answer is that it functioned worse than you noticed.

1. Solnit, Rebecca. Wanderlust: A History of Walking. New York: Viking, 2000. 2. Gros, Frédéric. A Philosophy of Walking. Translated by John Howe. London: Verso, 2014. 3. Oppezzo, Marily, and Daniel L. Schwartz. "Give Your Ideas Some Legs: The Positive Effect of Walking on Creative Thinking." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40, no. 4 (2014): 1142–1152. 4. Tatkin, Stan. Wired for Love: How Understanding Your Partner's Brain and Attachment Style Can Help You Defuse Conflict and Build a Secure Relationship. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, 2011. 5. Johnson, Sue. Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. New York: Little, Brown Spark, 2008. 6. Gottman, John M., and Nan Silver. The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1999. 7. Perel, Esther. Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence. New York: Harper, 2006. 8. Turkle, Sherry. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press, 2015. 9. Newport, Cal. Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World. New York: Portfolio, 2019. 10. Alter, Adam. Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. New York: Penguin Press, 2017. 11. Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. Translated by Emma Crawford and Mario von der Ruhr. London: Routledge, 2002. 12. Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge, 1970.