The Practice Of Community Remembrance — Honoring Shared History Together
The Psychology Of Unacknowledged Collective Trauma
In 1980, the DSM-III formally named Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. It was a clinical victory after decades of Vietnam veterans being told their suffering wasn't real. But even as PTSD became a household term, the field took longer to acknowledge something bigger: that trauma doesn't stay contained in the body of the person who experienced it. It moves. Through families. Through neighborhoods. Through generations.
Rachel Yehuda's work at Mount Sinai on Holocaust survivors and their children showed measurable epigenetic changes — cortisol regulation altered in the grandchildren of people who never personally set foot in a camp. Joy DeGruy's work on Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome mapped how the unresolved grief of slavery continued to shape Black American family systems a century and a half later. Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, a Lakota social worker, named "historical trauma" to describe what she saw in Indigenous communities — the cumulative emotional and psychological wounding across a lifespan and across generations, emanating from massive group trauma.
The pattern across all of this research is consistent: when collective trauma is not named, acknowledged, and ritualized, it does not fade. It transmits. It finds expression in addiction rates, in chronic disease, in educational outcomes, in incarceration, in the suicide rate, in the things we call "cultural problems" when we have forgotten the history that produced them.
Conversely: when communities build practices of acknowledgment, the research shows measurable shifts. Post-apartheid South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission wasn't a full repair — no ritual is — but follow-up studies showed that communities with active TRC engagement had lower levels of intergroup hostility than matched communities without. Rwanda's gacaca courts, imperfect as they were, allowed villages where neighbors had killed neighbors to return to functioning community life in ways that pure criminal prosecution couldn't have.
The mechanism isn't mysterious. Humans are story-making animals. When the story of what happened here is a shared truth, people can grieve it, fight about it, integrate it, and move. When it's a secret, a rumor, or a lie, the energy of it just circulates underground, expressing itself sideways, forever.
The EJI Model: How Soil Collection Works
The Equal Justice Initiative, founded by Bryan Stevenson in 1989, began documenting racial terror lynchings in America around 2010. Their research identified more than 4,400 documented racial terror lynchings between 1877 and 1950 across twelve Southern states, and hundreds more across the rest of the country. Most had no markers. Most had no public memory. Most towns where they happened had quietly moved on.
The Community Remembrance Project, launched around 2015, was EJI's answer to a specific question: how do you build a practice that descendants, neighbors, and strangers can participate in together, that honors the individual person, and that creates something durable?
The soil collection ritual looks like this. A local coalition forms — often a mix of descendants if they can be found, historians, clergy, students, civil rights veterans, and ordinary community members. EJI supports them with research, materials, and protocol. On a chosen day, the group gathers at or near the site where a person was killed. There is usually a reading — the person's name, what is known of their life, the date and circumstances of their death. There are often prayers, or a moment of silence, or testimony from descendants. Then participants fill a large glass jar with soil from the site. The jar is pre-labeled with the victim's name, the date of death, and the county. Multiple jars are often filled so one can stay with the local community and one can travel to EJI's Legacy Museum in Montgomery.
At the Legacy Museum, the jars form a wall. Hundreds of them now, each a different color of earth, each with a name. Visitors walk past and read. The effect is physical. You understand in your body what the numbers alone could not convey: these were people, and this is the ground where their lives were taken.
Beyond the soil itself, EJI's coalitions do related work. Historical markers installed at the sites, with careful language that names what happened and does not soften it. Essay contests for local high school students. Community dialogues. Some coalitions have moved on to address contemporary injustice in the same counties where the historical work began — because that's the point. Acknowledged history allows repair. Repair requires current action.
A Wider Frame: Other Remembrance Traditions Worth Studying
Stolpersteine ("stumbling stones"). Artist Gunter Demnig's project, begun in Germany in 1992, places small brass cubes in the sidewalk outside the last freely chosen home of a Holocaust victim. Each stone gives the person's name, birth year, and fate. There are now more than 100,000 Stolpersteine across dozens of European countries. The genius of the design: you come upon them by accident, while walking to the grocery store. The history is integrated into the ordinary life of the street. You have to literally stumble on it.
Día de los Muertos. The Mexican tradition of Day of the Dead is a model of how remembrance can be joyful rather than morbid. Families build ofrendas (altars) for their dead, share the food the departed loved, tell the stories. The dead are not gone. They are remembered specifically, individually, with pleasure. The communal dimension — whole towns decorating cemeteries, children baking pan de muerto with grandparents — transmits the practice across generations without requiring formal structure.
The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, Berlin. Peter Eisenman's 2005 installation — 2,711 concrete stelae across 19,000 square meters — made collective remembrance a public, architectural fact in the capital of the country that did the killing. The choice to refuse explanation, names, or symbols, and to let the scale and the disorientation of the space speak, remains controversial and effective.
Ocoee, Florida. On Election Day 1920, a white mob in Ocoee attacked Black residents who had come to vote, killed dozens, and burned the Black neighborhood to the ground. Survivors fled. Ocoee remained a sundown town for decades. The massacre was almost entirely erased from public memory until local organizers, journalists, and eventually the state of Florida began the work of recovery in the 2010s. A state-mandated curriculum was passed in 2020. The centennial brought the first significant public commemoration. It is possible to recover what was almost fully lost. It just takes someone deciding to do it.
Tulsa, 1921. The Tulsa Race Massacre Centennial Commission and the rediscovery and excavation of potential mass grave sites starting in 2020 is an ongoing case study in what full community remembrance looks like — historical research, forensic archaeology, survivor testimony (the last known survivors lived to see the centennial), reparations advocacy, and a public reckoning that is still in progress.
A Framework: The Five Practices
Across these traditions, the effective practices cluster into five types. Any community doing this work can use some combination of them.
1. Naming practices. Reading the names aloud. Inscribing them on markers, stones, walls, plaques. Speaking the facts of what happened, without softening. The power of a name read in public, in the place where the person was lost, cannot be overstated.
2. Site practices. Gathering at the actual location. Walking the route. Touching the ground. Planting something. The soil collection model. Geography carries memory, and returning to the place of loss is part of how communities reclaim it.
3. Calendar practices. An anniversary observed every year. Founders' Day. A death day. A flood day. The event becomes part of the community's cycle. The rhythm matters as much as any single observance. A one-time event is a gesture; a returning one is a practice.
4. Transmission practices. Teaching the story to children. Essay contests. Oral history projects. Elders telling. Youth asking. Without intergenerational transmission, the work ends when the first generation of organizers ages out.
5. Action practices. What does the remembrance require us to do differently now? A scholarship fund. A renamed street. A zoning change. A different set of history books in the local schools. Remembrance that doesn't produce action becomes performance.
How To Begin In Your Own Community
This is the concrete work. It can start with one person.
Step one: Find the story. Talk to elders. Visit the local historical society. Look at old newspapers on microfilm or in digitized archives. Walk the cemetery. Look for the gap — the place where the record goes quiet. That's usually where the story is. Specific resources: the Library of Congress's Chronicling America database (free, digitized historical newspapers), state archives, HBCU libraries if you are in the South, tribal archives if you are near Indigenous land.
Step two: Build the coalition. You need three or four people to begin. A local historian or amateur archivist. A person from the affected community (ideally a descendant or someone with lived connection). A clergy member, community elder, or trusted convener. A young person or teacher for transmission. The coalition will grow. It always does, once the work is named.
Step three: Choose the first act. Don't try to build the whole monument. Choose one practice from the five categories above. A walk. A gathering. A reading. A marker. The smallest act that feels real. Do that one thing well.
Step four: Make it returnable. Set the date. Next year, same day. Calendarize it. The first year is an event. The third year is a tradition. The tenth year is part of the community's identity.
Step five: Connect outward. You are not alone. EJI will partner with communities undertaking this work. Local historical societies, universities, and state humanities councils often have grant money available. Other communities doing similar work will share what they've learned. The work compounds when it's networked.
Common Failures And How To Avoid Them
Failure one: Making it about the organizers. The work has to center the people lost and the community still here. If it becomes a stage for the feelings of the people doing the organizing, it loses its weight.
Failure two: Performing without changing. If the remembrance is a one-day photo opportunity for local officials and nothing in the community actually shifts, the practice hollows out. Build in action requirements from the start.
Failure three: Excluding descendants and affected communities. The most common version of this is a well-meaning institution taking over the work from the people it most concerns. The leadership has to include, and often be led by, the community most affected.
Failure four: Skipping the hard facts. Soft language protects the perpetrators and insults the dead. Name what was done. Use the actual word. Lynching. Massacre. Displacement. Theft. The specificity is the point.
Failure five: Treating it as finished. The work is never finished. There is always another name. Another site. Another piece of the story nobody told. The practice continues because the need continues.
Exercises
Exercise one: The ten-block history. Pick ten city blocks near where you live. Spend a weekend finding out what was there a hundred years ago. Who lived there. Who was pushed out. What was built and what was lost. Write it down. This alone, as a personal practice, will change how you walk your own neighborhood.
Exercise two: The elder interview. Identify one elder in your community who has lived there at least forty years. Ask them: what happened here that nobody talks about anymore? Record the conversation if they allow. Transcribe it. Share it with at least one other person. If three people in your community did this, you would have the beginnings of an oral history archive.
Exercise three: The anniversary calendar. Identify three anniversaries — of losses, of milestones, of founding events — relevant to your community. Put them on your personal calendar. Show up for each one this year, even if no one else is observing. Next year, invite one person. This is how traditions start.
Citations And Further Reading
Equal Justice Initiative, Lynching in America: Confronting the Legacy of Racial Terror (3rd edition, 2017). The foundational document of the Community Remembrance Project.
Bryan Stevenson, Just Mercy (2014), for the broader context of EJI's work.
Joy DeGruy, Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome: America's Legacy of Enduring Injury and Healing (2005).
Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, "The Historical Trauma Response Among Natives and Its Relationship with Substance Abuse," Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 2003.
Rachel Yehuda et al., "Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation," Biological Psychiatry, 2016.
Scott Ellsworth, Death in a Promised Land: The Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 (1982) and The Ground Breaking (2021).
Paul Ortiz, Emancipation Betrayed: The Hidden History of Black Organizing and White Violence in Florida (2005), for Ocoee and its context.
The Stolpersteine project: stolpersteine.eu.
Closing
We are the ones who will not forget. That's the practice. That's the whole thing.
Next action: pick one elder, one neighborhood, one year that matters. Ask the question. Write down the answer. Repeat.
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
Be the first to share how this landed.