Language and the words you don't share

For most adults raised in one language and operating later in another, the first language is where the autonomic nervous system stored its first vocabulary: the lullaby, the warning, the smell-name, the sob-word, the prayer. Even decades into fluent operation in a second language, these stay attached to the first. When you stub your toe, when you wake from a nightmare, when a child is hurt, the word that comes is usually in the language of the first six years. A partner who does not know that language is, in those moments, slightly outside the most private layer of their partner. This is not a tragedy. It is a structural fact of bilingual life and one of the reasons many bilingual people keep a connection to their first language even when most of their daily life is in another tongue.

Operating in a second language uses more cognitive resources than operating in a first language, especially in emotionally loaded or unfamiliar contexts. The second-language partner is, all day, paying a small tax their partner is not paying. After ten hours of work in a second language, the partner comes home with less in the tank for the marriage. The fluent partner often misreads this as withdrawal or moodiness. It is fatigue of a specific kind: the fatigue of a brain that has been running a translation layer for most of its waking hours. The remedy is partly practical. Time in the first language is not optional rest; it is restoration.

Many bilingual couples fight in the shared language, which is the second language of one of them. Pavlenko's interviews show that this often advantages the first-language partner: they are quicker, more nuanced, better at deploying tone and irony. The second-language partner, especially when upset, can come across as blunter or more aggressive than they feel, because the soft modifiers are missing from their available vocabulary in that language. Knowing this, the first-language partner can slow down, can refuse to win arguments on a technicality of word choice, can offer to switch to the other language for the heart of the disagreement when possible. Most do not, because winning is easier.

Every language has words with no clean equivalent in another. The Portuguese saudade. The German Sehnsucht. The Arabic ya'aburnee. The Yiddish bashert. The English "privacy" in many languages. These are not curiosities. They are concepts a person has, that they cannot say in their partner's language without a paragraph of approximation. Over years, the second-language partner stops trying to convey them and just lets that part of their inner life go quiet in the household. The household becomes a place where they are slightly less articulate about themselves than they are anywhere else. The fluent partner does not realize this is happening because they are not missing anything they could miss.

The second-language partner often has an accent in the shared language, especially if it was learned in adulthood. In some cultures the accent is read as charming. In some it is read as suspect, as a signal of foreignness that lowers the partner's status with strangers, with employers, with the first-language partner's family. The first-language partner has to decide whether to ignore this or to be the partner who notices when their family or friends are treating their spouse as slightly lesser because of accent. The honest version notices. It does not require speeches; it requires small, consistent moves to keep the spouse's full personhood visible at the table.

The children of bilingual couples are a language decision. They can be raised bilingual, with one parent committed to speaking only their first language to the child, even when the easier path is the shared language. They can be raised monolingual in the household language, with the second-language partner's tongue treated as the partner's private matter. The choice has long consequences. A child raised bilingual will be able to speak to their grandparents in their grandparents' language, will have access to that side of the family in a way they otherwise will not, and will inherit cognitive and cultural advantages well-documented in the bilingualism literature. A child raised monolingual will, in time, be a stranger to half of their inheritance, and the second-language parent will quietly mourn that without often saying so.

Many bilingual couples develop a private code: phrases pulled from each partner's first language that have become household shorthand. Pet names. Endearments. Words for specific emotional states that have entered the marriage's private vocabulary. Grosjean writes about this as one of the genuine joys of bilingual partnership: the household grows its own dialect. It is worth tending. The shared private vocabulary is one of the places where the asymmetry of language is repaired, because both partners contribute, and the household becomes a place neither could have built alone in their own first language.

The way an apology works depends on language. In some languages, an apology requires a specific verb form, a specific posture, a specific phrase that the partner of another tradition does not know to listen for. A bilingual couple sometimes has fights that do not end because the apology was offered in one language's terms and the offended partner was waiting, without realizing it, for the form they would have recognized as a real apology in their first language. Naming this is the move. Asking, after a fight, "what would have felt like a real apology to you, in your terms" is one of the most useful things a bilingual partner can say.

Humor is the highest-bandwidth language skill, and the last to be acquired. A second-language partner can be fully competent in their adopted language at work, in conversation, in argument, and still not be able to be funny in it the way they are funny in their first. This is one of the quietest losses. A funny person who cannot be fully funny in their household language is being met as a less interesting version of themselves. Spending time, occasionally, in environments where they get to be funny in their first language is not a luxury; it is part of staying themselves.

Many bilinguals read for pleasure in their first language even when they think in their second. Reading is a private activity in which the first language gets to live, uninterrupted, on the page. A partner who notices what their spouse reads and in what language is paying attention to where their spouse goes to be most themselves. Letting that room exist, not requiring everything to happen in the shared language, is a small daily kindness.

A complicated experience that some second-language partners report is the slow attrition of the first language under prolonged absence. After years of operating in the second language, in the new country, in the marriage, the first language begins to recede. Words go missing. Calls to old family members feel slightly halting. This is grief, even when it is not named. The first-language partner can support their spouse by encouraging contact, by not seeing the trips home or the calls in another tongue as competition, by valuing the first language out loud rather than treating it as a private hobby.

The First Law of the Manual says the species is one. It does not say everyone speaks the same words. Two languages in a household are not a problem to be solved but a condition to be inhabited. The work is to refuse the lazy version in which one language is the real one and the other is decoration. Both are real. Both carry whole interior worlds. A marriage that takes this seriously becomes a place where both partners can be fully themselves, in different languages, sometimes in front of each other, sometimes alone, with the understanding that the partner who cannot follow into the other language is not failing love. They are practicing humility in the face of what they cannot reach, and choosing, every day, to keep loving the person who lives partly in a country they have not been to.

Pavlenko, Aneta. Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Pavlenko, Aneta. The Bilingual Mind: And What It Tells Us About Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Pavlenko, Aneta, ed. Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression, and Representation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2006.

Grosjean, François. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.

Grosjean, François. Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Grosjean, François, and Ping Li. The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

Dewaele, Jean-Marc. Emotions in Multiple Languages. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Piller, Ingrid. Bilingual Couples Talk: The Discursive Construction of Hybridity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.

Wierzbicka, Anna. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Bialystok, Ellen. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Kramsch, Claire. The Multilingual Subject: What Foreign Language Learners Say About Their Experience and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Hoffmann, Eva. Lost in Translation: A Life in a New Language. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1989.